Monthly Archives: November 2012

New Information on the Minnesota Musicians’ Website

For anyone interested, the musicians have just released some interesting informational reading on their website, including answers to such questions as “Why haven’t the musicians made a formal counteroffer?” and “What is the difference between a joint independent financial analysis and audit reports?”

We’ll have to wait to see what management says in response to the questions raised here, but in the meantime we’ve got a lot to mull over… Here are some of the paragraphs that stood out to me:

Audits do not cover an institution’s viability, stability, business plan, strategic plan, the quality of its management, comparative performance, or present and future prospects. A joint, independent financial analysis would review all of these things, and would assess current and future trends, opportunities and risks…

In effect, management is asking its musicians to make an “investment” of $5M annually in concessions, without permitting the kind of financial analysis any rational investor or lender would require…

Jon Campbell, the Chairman of MOA’s board, admitted he had been “wrong” at the time of MOA’s last major projections (part of the 2007 contract negotiations). He jokingly refers to the fact that the musicians must be wondering “what he was smoking.” He was “wrong” by $100M. This past performance raises natural questions about current projections…

You may be interested to know that the Minnesota Orchestral Association has hired the same law firm responsible for the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra lockout, as well as the American Crystal Sugar lockout mentioned in the article linked above…

And they also came out and said what so many of my readers have been saying from day one:

We have been through many tough yet productive contract negotiations over the years. This is different. This is ideology-driven.

Election Day may be over, but it appears the political battles in Minnesota have only just begun.


Filed under Not My Writing

SOTL Christmas Calendar Announcement

It’s beginning to sound suspiciously like Christmas out there. I heard Santa Baby at a store the other day. [shudder]

Why was this necessary?


It’s been a…wild year, to say the least. As a thank-you, I’m cooking up a little holiday surprise for everybody involved in the Orchestral Apocalypse. Oh, yes, you heard me right: everybody! We may not be able to agree on anything, but we all have a part to play in the First (Annual?) Song of the Lark Celebratory Advent Calendar!


The details are going to stay under wraps for a while longer, so try to contain your enthusiasm for just a couple more weeks. ;) I can pull the gist of it off myself, but I need your help to make it extra-special.

Here’s what I’d like you to do:

Write me a paragraph about your favorite 2012 Minnesota Orchestra or SPCO memory. Lockout concerts, protesting, meeting cool people, whatever. OR if you’d just like to send your encouragement to those affected by the Apocalypse (musicians or listeners), you can do that, too. Sign your full name, sign a nickname, sign an initial; doesn’t matter to me.

Send that paragraph of love and warmth and hope to songofthelarkchristmasproject[at], exchanging the [at] for an @, obviously.

Remember: follow the example of baby Jesus, and don’t be rude to anyone…or else your paragraph will end up in the trash bin.

If selected, your paragraph will appear on a virtual Advent calendar, to be published on Tumblr. (If you don’t know what a Tumblr is, here’s an example. They’re sort of like online scrapbooks. They are awesome. And they’re the perfect platform to publish virtual Advent calendars.)

The deadline to send your memory or encouragement is Thursday November 29 at noon.

So get writing, folks. And mark your calendar for December first, when the Advent calendar will be going live. More details later. Thanks for the support. xx

Falalalala, la la la la.


Filed under My Writing

What We Know About Minnesota Orchestra’s Finances – And What We Don’t, Part II

Once again I’m turning the floor over to Minneapolis non-profit professional Mary Schaefle… You can read Part I of her series on the Minnesota Orchestra’s finances here.


I’m back with another installment on Minnesota Orchestra finances. If you haven’t seen my first guest post, head on over to learn about the Minnesota Orchestra’s endowment.

The last post focused on the endowment. According to the Orchestra’s strategic plan, endowment/trust proceeds are one-third of their annual income. It’s time to turn to the other two legs of the stool, ticket sales and contributions.

Ticket Sales and Other Earned Income

Management lists declining ticket sales as a significant financial challenge. It’s true ticket revenue declined 8.3% when you compare the season ending in 2009 with 2011 (990, page 9 available on Guidestar).

Let’s turn to the words of Orchestra management to learn why that happened. In 2011, the change was “due primarily to a reduction in the number of concerts”. This refrain was repeated in the 2010 report, when a reduction in ticket revenue was attributed to “16 fewer concerts, a dropoff of 9 percent.” Mr. Henson went on to say decreasing the number of concerts was part of their financial strategy to control costs. Sure, decreasing the number of concerts means lower costs for ushers, box office staff, concession staff and many other things. But it also means lower revenue. If your financial strategy is to decrease costs through fewer concerts, but that same strategy also means decreasing revenue, do you really come out ahead?

Orchestra concerts are not the only events at Orchestra Hall. Decreases in other earned revenue, things like the Jazz series and hall rentals, were more than double the drop in classical tickets, by more than $1.3 million or 18%. We don’t know why those things decreased (interestingly, concessions showed an increase). But it makes me nervous that the new business strategy plans to broaden “program offerings to respond to customer interest.” If the plan does rely on income that has been dropping more rapidly than concert sales, major revisions are required.

You may remember my suggestion in the last article for an independent financial analysis. The questions I’m raising here wouldn’t be answered by that kind of oversight. A respected leader in performing arts management, preferably orchestra management, would be the best person to review the strategic plan to ensure it is sound.

Contributions and Grants

If you go to the Orchestra’s tax forms (after all, I have been harping on them), you’d see huge dollar amounts in contributions. Those figures are a combination of all donations, including the Hall renovation, the endowment, and other restricted funds. The Orchestra’s management is correct that they can’t divert money from the endowment or any other restricted fund to pay for this year’s season.

We see a steady increase in government grants (990, Part VIII). My guess is this is due in part to the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment, though we should give credit where it’s due to the grant writing staff at the Orchestra. Competition for those funds has been fierce.

If we turn to the financial statements, we get more details about what is contributed for operating activities (translation- things such as musicians’ salaries and concert expenses). Again, grant income is strong. Current year grants double from 2009 to 2011 – impressive. Grants released from restriction ($$ received last year for programs this year) increased to a lesser degree. Grant writing staff deserve kudos for the $1.75 million they brought in. Before anyone starts questioning or speculating, no I don’t know the individuals doing the work. I don’t even know if the Orchestra has staff grant writers or if they hire a consultant as some nonprofits do. But I think we should give credit where it is due.

Contributions, on the other hand, didn’t fare as well. Remember we are focused on unrestricted donations for current operations, not any of the $$ for the Hall or the endowment. Unrestricted gifts decreased by close to $750,000 in three years, or almost 25%. I wondered whether focusing on the campaign would have a dampening effect on general, or annual, contributions. We can’t say for certain, but it’s tempting to think that the same effort for the Orchestra as a whole would have eased or erased the deficit.

Wrapping Up the Income Side of Things

We know that ticket sales have declined as a whole, but aren’t sure how much of that is due to the decrease in concerts. There could have been other factors. We know that hall rentals and non-classical concerts fell by even larger amounts.

Grant writing is a bright spot, but annual or unrestricted donations have decreased while the Orchestra was focused on the endowment and Hall renovation campaign. Again we don’t know if there were additional influences causing the decline.

I’ll be posting a #1A in the ”Minnesota Orchestra Financials Series” (never thought I’d see those words together). I asked a colleague who works as a nonprofit investment analyst to review my previous post. The one thing I can share now is the 5 year return on the endowment is within a reasonable range. That is reassuring. But it doesn’t answer what I consider the most significant question – why did the Board use only half of the 2011 draw for current operations, and how was the remaining $6.1 million spent? After I look at the Notes with my colleague’s help (did you know they have such a thing in Financial Statements?), I’ll provide an updated and/or corrected view on investments and my questions about the 2008 stock sales and the Orchestra’s portfolio.

After all these words about income and revenue, what do we know? Management’s statement that revenue has decreased is true. But I believe there are enough questions posed here that the Board needs to take another look at ways to increase revenue in addition to considering cuts. They need to take a good hard look at the Strategic Business Plan. Is it a “Vision for a Sound Future”? We all want the Minnesota Orchestra back on stage and performing. We need a plan that will get us there and keep us there.


Here is Part 3

Thank you, Mary! Mary will be in the comment section to answer any questions or comments you may have.


Filed under Not My Writing

Your Daily Dose of Cognitive Dissonance

Here’s the full Strib article about Osmo’s letter.

Campbell said he was not surprised that Vänskä’s letter was released to news media in a labor dispute that has become increasingly public. “But I’m certainly disappointed that we’re not sitting down in private trying to find a solution,” he said.

In case you forgot, Mr. Campbell was the man who said OK to releasing the entirety of the proposed contract online on September 5, weeks before the deadline of September 30. (It came a day after the SPCO released their proposed contract. Coincidence? ….) In their open letter, the MOA Negotiations Committee said, “For nearly five months, we have held our negotiations behind closed doors to foster a respectful process. With the deadline for contract expiration less than a month away, we feel that now is the time to update all who have a stake in the outcome on the proposals that we have put forth to musicians.”

So, to recap:

Management going public with a draconian proposed contract behind musicians’ backs weeks before the old contract expired = helpful and necessary

Musicians (presumably) going public with a letter their music director wrote to them discussing the future of their orchestra = disappointing

Private negotiations in September = bad

Private negotiations in November = good

Got that?

Interestingly, it’s possible to read between the lines and realize management is not completely comfortable with what has just transpired. Despite their ridiculous email response, they obviously understand that Osmo’s letter is a PR loss for them…because otherwise they would have wanted to be the ones to release it to the press. Correct? And they acknowledge here they didn’t. So aha, Mr. Campbell. You’ve inadvertently shown your hand. If this letter was such a great bolster to your cause, why weren’t you running to the Star Tribune office with it? (Not to mention…there was no link to Osmo’s full letter in their email response. It’s almost as if they don’t want us to read the whole thing.)

It must be tough to live under the weight of such cognitive dissonance.



Filed under My Writing

Response to Management’s Response to Osmo’s Letter

I’m no expert in orchestral management, but… If you’re the CEO of a world-renowned orchestra, and your conductor sends you this letter…wouldn’t you maybe want to change tack?

November 12, 2012

Dear Members of the Minnesota Orchestra Board and the Musicians of the Orchestra:

In the last few years, the Minnesota Orchestra has truly established itself as a world-class orchestra. Critics and audiences around the world praise what we have achieved together. The national and international attention we have attracted through our Beethoven and Sibelius recordings, our Carnegie Hall and BBC Proms engagements, as well as our crucial work at home is the result of the invested talent, energy and commitment of an exceptional group of artists, not merely competent professionals.

The Board is justifiably proud of the results which the Minnesota Orchestra has achieved; many other Boards would be delighted if their own orchestras achieved anything like the level of the Minnesota Orchestra. This is all the more gratifying when you compare our costs with our peers in Chicago, New York, San Francisco or Los Angeles.

The Twin Cities area is such a special place. No metropolitan area our size can boast the award-winning cultural offerings that we do. We are the home of several Fortune 500 companies as well as many other innovative businesses. Our downtown is thriving, our unemployment low. Smart, creative people choose to live here because of all the Twin Cities has to offer. No other market our size has an orchestra such as ours, playing at the same level as the greatest orchestras in the world. A metropolitan leader as cultured as this must protect, preserve and cultivate such an asset.

But now I fear we may be on a path to diminishing greatly, if not destroying, the Minnesota Orchestra as an artistic and cultural leader. While there is no progress in the contract negotiations; while players are unable to rehearse and perform together; while some are obliged to seek jobs elsewhere – I am desperately anxious about the risk posed to the quality and spirit of the orchestra for the future. I become deeply emotional when I listen to our latest Sibelius recording edit of the 1st and 4th Symphonies, first because the music is so moving and superbly played in the hands of our musicians, and second because I fear that to preserve our reputations I may need to consider letting go of the remaining recording projects we have planned. I will also be in a position to think seriously about the viability of bringing a diminished or compromised orchestra to Carnegie Hall for our four concerts in the 2013-14 season, plus international touring thereafter, including a re-invitation to the BBC Proms.

It is difficult to imagine that the current negotiation process will sustain the orchestra’s future. Rather, the process may rob us of the chance of having a world class ensemble for years to come. When the lockout is over, the Twin Cities may have a “professional orchestra” but inevitably not the same one, nor a highly regarded one. Will anyone – either the Board or the Musicians – be able to reflect back with pride at what was accomplished during this season? The Association and the Musicians must come together to mitigate any more damage.

It is clear that the orchestra’s finances are deeply troubled and finding a solution must balance business and art. I urge the Board and the players of the MO, from the bottom of my heart, to seek new and creative ways – without insulting or demeaning – to pursue these negotiations, to re-establish a common vision, to identify a path forward, in partnership, to a financially and artistically sustainable future. There must be some way to re-establish trust and bring both parties to negotiate once again.

The Twin Cities is a unique and great place to live. The 109-year-old Minnesota Orchestra is a great orchestra. We are all proud of what we have achieved here. The world-class Orchestra Hall this orchestra needs and deserves is only months from completion. Once again, many other orchestras envy our significant accomplishments.

Nine years ago, you brought me here and entrusted me to lead a world-class orchestra, which I have enthusiastically and faithfully done. It is my responsibility as Music Director, and one that I take extremely seriously, to maintain and develop the artistic level of this great orchestra. If the orchestra does not play, its quality will most definitely diminish. Please, do what it takes, find a way, talk together, listen to each other and come to a resolution of this dreadful situation.


Osmo Vänskä

That letter speaks for itself. I have nothing to add to it.

For some reason, I don’t get emails from the Minnesota Orchestra management any more. (I stopped receiving them after I started being critical of them on this blog. I logged in tonight to make sure that all my contact information is current and up-to-date, and it is. Sigh. Whatever.)

But! Lucky for me, a brave friend rode to the rescue and forwarded me management’s official response, so that I wouldn’t have to toss and turn tonight wondering what Mr. Henson and Mr. Campbell are thinking of this terrible blow to their cause.

Dear Patron,

We want to make you aware that we recently received a letter from Music Director Osmo Vänskä expressing his hope that the Board and musicians will come together to resolve our negotiations. He wrote, “It is clear that the orchestra’s finances are deeply troubled and finding a solution must balance business and art. I urge the Board and the players of the Minnesota Orchestra…to pursue these negotiations, in partnership, to a financially and artistically sustainable future.”

Holy…crap. You…think that letter was written in support of you and your methods? What – ? Just – what?


Is this some Rorschach test?

What do you see? Is Osmo Vänskä praising management’s handling of the situation? Or is he desperately begging them to sit down and talk and compromise? Don’t worry; your answer will remain confidential between you and your therapist.

We agree. It has been a great partnership – between musicians, Music Director, Board and community – that has led the Minnesota Orchestra to great artistic heights; no one entity could have done it without the other. Similarly, in the end, the way forward for our contract negotiations will also be through partnership.


*spews water across keyboard*

Quick question. Can you please share with me one aspect of this negotiation that has been done with the word “partnership” in mind? Just one…

It is for this reason that we confused by the musicians’ unwillingness to return to the negotiations with a contract proposal. How can a negotiation take place if one side refuses to participate? It has now been 31 weeks since the Board put forward its proposal and we have yet to receive a counterproposal from the musicians.

In the Star Tribune on November 8, Labor relations expert John Budd, of the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management, agreed that the musicians’ positions are “structural requests around the parameters of the negotiations and not formal counterproposals.”

Yeah, I actually have that article here, and quoted from it on the blog. Did you take a quick moment to glance at what people – the public you are purportedly serving – in the comment sections said? If you haven’t, here’s a little sample…

Why is management collecting their salary if no concerts are being performed? We certainly don’t blame the musicians (those who actually make the money) for the current situation. Management is supposed to plan and raise money. They are the ones who failed and the ones who need to be replaced.

How much damage is management willing to do to the orchestra? Appparently, quite a bit. It’s disgusting.

There are two lockouts by management and the Board: the musicians and the public. Both are victims of an arrogant disregard for the interests of either.

This is so sad, and reflects utter failure and incompetence at the top. Is there not one courageous board member, or group of prominent donors, who will stand up, and demand another approach ? The Founders are spinning in their graves. Shame on you board, and admin. You are ruining one of the great institutions of the nation, and not one of you speaks out ? Your little social club is disgusting. Replace the board with those capable of leading, with the understanding of negotiating difficult situations, and creating consensus. Someone need to step-up here, and do some reconciliation, and bridge building. This is disgusting in so many ways, and betrays a vastly sick organization, rotten to the core.

I have been reading article after article in a variety of sources – newspapers, MPR, blogs . . . not ONE commenter who self-identifies as an audience member supports management. Not ONE. As a subscriber and donor to one orchestra and a ticket-purchaser to the other, I am furious that we are not being included here. The arrogance of management is astounding.

Yeah. Suddenly the stuff I’ve said on this blog doesn’t seem so bad, does it?? While you’re at it, do you want to hear some input from your Facebook page?

The musicians ARE the orchestra. Pay up.

I LOVE the Arts, please show respect and pay the musicians. This post is truly a shame.

Very disappointed that you have not been able to work out an agreement which is more fair to the musicians.

Shame on management and the Board for getting into this situation and for their unwillingness to go to arbitration.

Management and the Board needs to STOP acting like the victim here, and take responsibility. You are the steward of OUR orchestra, entrusted with ensuring that it maintains its place in the world as a top-tier orchestra. You should be answering to the musicians and the patrons, not some imaginary stockholders! You are holding this community hostage, and we WILL NOT stand for it.

Yeah. That tone actually continues…unanimously…and unambiguously…throughout the entire comment section. I think you might want to check it out, because, if this email is any indication, you haven’t.

We can only reach a resolution if we meet at the table, share proposals and begin earnest conversations, something which we are eager to do.

Oh, yes. You’re so totally eager to come to a settlement that you refuse to submit to an independent financial analysis, even when just about all the numbers you’ve released publicly contradict themselves.

Come on, guys. My sarcasm muscle is getting weak from overuse.

And by the way, since you’re apparently suffering from a major attack of amnesia, the musicians offered to meet at a table less than two weeks ago. And you turned them down.

We have great empathy for our musicians—and our audiences—right now;

BWAHAHAHAHA. You have great empathy for me?


And you have –

Great empathy –

For the people whose salaries and health insurance you cut off?


What the – ?

*goes to find dictionary*

*looks to see if “empathy” means the same thing in 2012 as it did in 1997 when I was in grade school and first learned the definition of the word*

the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.

*slams book shut*

*checks calendar to see if it’s Opposites Day*

Hey, Opposites Day is actually November 13th.

Um….did I just decode the entire meaning of this email?

*checks date on email*

Oh, shoot. It’s dated November 14th. I didn’t.

So as best I know, empathy does, in fact, still mean today what it meant in 1997.

I have no idea what they’re talking about.

however, we cannot continue performing on borrowed time. Last year our organization posted a $2.9 million deficit, and we anticipate this year’s shortfall to be $6 million. In order to protect the Minnesota Orchestra for the long term, we must address our financial challenges now, rather than push them down the road and allow them to multiply. We believe it is not only possible to combine great artistry and financial viability; it is absolutely essential.













It is our greatest desire to find a meaningful resolution to this labor impasse quickly so that the music can resume again for our community – and continue for many, many decades. We are grateful for your support.

Hahahaha. Hey, FYI, absolutely nobody supports you. Just a little head’s up there. If you don’t realize this, things might get a little awkward next time you show up to a concert and various patrons recognize you. Judging by the Strib comments, and the furious comments on your orchestra’s Facebook page, I’d advise wearing a mask next time you go to a show.

May I recommend this stylish accessory for your next outing to the symphony?


Where do we go from here?

No clue. Absolutely none at all.

I literally don’t know what could cause management to give a single inch, or submit to the public’s call for transparency, or cause Mr. Henson to say “yes, I made some mistakes along the way, and I’m sorry.” An internationally renowned conductor practically begging the two sides to sit down and talk to one another? (Doesn’t seem to have swayed Henson or Campbell.) Big donors withdrawing their support en masse? (I don’t know; there’s one hugely important one who has been very public in her support of musicians, and I’m assuming words have been exchanged with her behind the scenes. I’m guessing if she’s annoyed, then others are, too. Still hasn’t changed anything, at least publicly.) A counter-proposal from musicians halfway between what management is suggesting and what the musicians had in September? Say, totally theoretically, a 10% pay cut, with benefits and working conditions remaining unchanged? (No, management would reject that, and just start harping on how out-of-touch the musicians are with fiscal realities.) Maybe Mr. Henson could come work for my state’s governor? They’d get along splendidly, I’d think. (No, my governor would never pay anyone $400,000 to work in arts management…) Intervention from Governor Dayton or Mayor Rybak? I have no idea what they could do to help, if anything (?). Members of the board who disagree with Mr. Henson, and Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Davis, and Mr. Cutler, speaking up and going rogue? A civil war within the board? Who knows if even that would help. A criminal investigation? Highly doubt there are any grounds for that…

So… I… don’t know.

I don’t know.

The only comforting thing here? I’m just a patron, and nothing more. I’m not privy to inside information. I don’t know what insiders might be having heated conversations behind closed doors. I don’t know what board members might be tossing and turning tonight and wondering what they might say or do in the coming weeks. I don’t know where the governor or the mayor are, or what power or influence they could wield. I can’t see the whole picture. I’m not omniscient, by any means. And tonight? That’s a blessing. I can go to bed tonight hoping and praying that Osmo’s beautiful letter will have some positive effect on this horrifying situation.

That being said, my heart breaks for all of us tonight.

Because we were all betrayed.

And betrayed mightily.


Filed under My Writing

Response to Ken Cutler’s 11/11 Strib Editorial


The musicians must make a counteroffer

I have been a season-ticket holder for the Minnesota Wild since their first game and a Minnesota Orchestra subscriber since 1975, and I serve on the orchestra board. I am frustrated that my two favorite winter activities are in the midst of lockouts. But at least in hockey I can take heart that the sides are talking about contract terms and that each side has presented proposals and counterproposals. In the case of the orchestra, however, two proposals have been presented to the musicians, as long ago as April, yet no counterproposal has been made.

The hockey players never demanded an independent financial analysis before making a counterproposal. They did their own work after examining the league’s finances, yet had even less insight than do the musicians, who have audited financials and 1,200 pages of documents. Unless the musicians offer a counterproposal, no progress can be made. And they must recognize that the orchestra cannot survive if concert revenues only cover 22 percent of operating expenses, a significant portion of which is musician salaries.

I truly love the orchestra and its fine musicians, but if this continues I will think seriously about canceling my season tickets, ending my annual contributions and eliminating the bequest to the orchestra in my will.


Well then feel free to resign, I guess

I know dozens of people from all around the world who would be delighted to take the awful inconvenience of being on the Minnesota Orchestra board off your hands. Contact me ASAP and we can discuss options.

If you do resign or withdraw your contributions, take solace in the fact that if the current proposed contract is ratified, many more people will cancel their season tickets, end their annual contributions, and eliminate their bequests. So we may lose you, but we will retain many others who we otherwise would not have. So it will probably be, as the Star Tribune said about the Minnesota Orchestra’s holiday season, a “net” “wash.”

Also, I hope that as a corporate lawyer you don’t endorse the business practices you seem to be recommending here. I highly doubt that when you represented AmCom Software, Inc., in its sale to US Mobility, Inc., for $163,000,000 that you would have willingly overseen a transaction that included such egregiously misleading and confusing numbers, no matter how many thousands of pages of information you had in your possession. And since over the months nobody in management has addressed the musicians’ allegation that there are conflicting numbers at play, and since we’ve caught Mr. Henson blatantly lying about the fiscal health of the orchestra at least once before, and since Mr. Davis has been cheerfully deceptive about numbers in the past, and since the draw amounts released by the Orchestra do not match those listed on their tax forms, I’m sure you’ll forgive me for assuming that there are misleading numbers at play within those 1200 pages. You’d agree, it would be naive to assume otherwise.

While I have you here, you mind answering some of these hundred questions? Also: do you know why the orchestra was trumpeting its financial health so loudly in 2010? I’ve been asking for weeks now and nobody from the Orchestra has addressed the discrepancy. Hey, maybe we could set up an in-depth interview to discuss the conflict from your perspective. I’ve got a whole group of well-informed people who would love to talk to you. We could have a conference call. A Google Hangout! You can record those and upload them onto Youtube for the whole world to see. It could be awesome. Contact me! Seriously!

Sorry about your favorite winter activities being canceled. That sucks. Not as bad as, say, losing your job and health insurance over Christmas. But it still sucks.


Edit, later – Oh, and by the way, take a look at the differences between the two proposals. They’re basically identical. It’s completely disingenuous – nay, irresponsible – to insinuate there are any substantive differences between them.


Filed under My Writing


I’m just going to leave this here. It speaks for itself. From the Star Tribune

Thursday’s cancellations will have consequences beyond the orchestra.

The Minneapolis Convention Center had projected income of $274,000 from the fall and holiday orchestra seasons, said spokeswoman Kirsten Montag. And the Minnesota Chorale, which had been scheduled for dates with the orchestra in October, November and December, will lose nearly all of its earned income for the fiscal year, said executive director Bob Peskin.

“We’ll have to make up the lost income with further expense cuts and increased donations,” Peskin said.

Orchestra president and CEO Michael Henson said the December dates — which include classical, jazz and presentations in addition to the holiday fare — were projected to make up 19.3 percent of annual ticket revenue. However, the net impact is a wash because the orchestra won’t have to pay rent at the Convention Center or musician salaries and benefits.


Filed under Not My Writing

What We Know About Minnesota Orchestra’s Finances – and What We Don’t, Part I

There is an old stereotype that artists are terrible with numbers. Many enforce the stereotype (me, for instance), while others defy it. Happily, Mary Schaefle defies it, and she is today’s guest blogger!

Mary is a Twin Cities nonprofit professional and community violinist. You may have seen her name in the comment section here at SOTL, on Facebook, or on the Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra’s website. I highly recommend reading the two letters she sent to Minnesota Orchestra management; you can find those here and here. I’ve been staying away from too much in-depth analysis of numbers, because I obviously don’t know much about non-profit nitty-gritty. Happily, however, Mary does, and she offered to take a look at some of the public documents discussing the Orchestra’s finances, so that we might at least try to figure some of this stuff out on our own. Hey, if management isn’t going to answer our questions, what else are we supposed to do?

You can take a look at some of the forms she refers to online. Unfortunately I can’t link directly to them, but if you sign up for a free account with Guidestar, and look up the Minnesota Orchestral Association, you can download some of the documents she mentions. If you have any questions or refutations to make, the comment section is open, and Mary will answer you directly, and I will edit the original article as needed. How’s that for service? I’d be so delighted if management would do the same for us, but for some reason that’s too much to ask… Anyway. Many thanks to Mary for contributing such an interesting piece. I hope we get some answers to the questions she raises, and soon.


Minnesota Orchestra’s management has told us they are making “difficult and necessary decisions” and can only spend what they earn. So what do we know about the Minnesota Orchestra’s finances? Tax returns and audited financial statements give us some answers, but unfortunately more questions. There will be plenty of numbers in this post, but I’ll try my best to explain terms.

Remember that I’m not an accountant and certainly not a CPA. I am a person who cares deeply about the Minnesota Orchestra, and who likes to dig through nonprofit tax returns and financials. They can tell you a lot about the organization as long as you have a lot of time and either a translator or a basic understanding of nonprofit finance.

Endowment Income – Is That the Problem?

Management has pointed to the 2008 recession and the resulting decrease in endowment revenue as a key problem. The Orchestra’s endowment lost $12.9 million that year (reported on the 2008-2009 tax forms which are available at Guidestar). They’ve since experienced modest gains of $6.3 and $5.6 million (990, Schedule D, Part V).

But endowment challenges are much larger than a one-time decrease in size. Organizations assume they will receive a certain amount of income from the endowment each year. Those estimates can be conservative, assuming smaller returns, or they can be wildly optimistic. Looking at the Orchestra’s strategic plan, those 2008-09 investments were projected to be $201.4 million. The actual assets were $135.3 million, a difference of $52.2 million before the market tanked. The $12.9 million loss was piled on top of that. The 2007 projections are somewhere between overly optimistic, flawed, and just plain wrong. Perhaps this was the genesis of the financial problems.

Let’s get to how that impacts us today. Back in 2009, our endowment “paycheck” was lowered by 13% compared to our projections. Then things got even worse and our 2012 “paycheck” is expected to be 45% lower. They know the 2007 projections are wrong, but just keep using them. Why do they appear in the 2011 Strategic Plan? Do management and the Board have a new set of projections for future years? A review by an investment analyst, which is typically not part of an audit, is needed.

The Endowment Draw and Two More Questions

Comparing tax returns to media statements and the Minnesota Orchestra website raises two more questions. The draw on the endowment (the income or “paycheck” I mentioned above) has been excessive according to management. They are correct that a 19% draw could deplete the endowment in just over five years. That one is simple math.

According to our friend the 990, the endowment distributions (read “draw”) were 16.3%, 9.4% and 7.8% from 2008-09 through 2010-11 (Schedule D, Part V). As I pointed out in the comments section of Emily’s earlier post on the endowment, the draw amounts released by Minnesota Orchestra do not match their tax forms. That means percentages are off as well. Yes, we once again need that accountant.

Now onto an item that – at least for me – is really troubling. Audited financial statements list “Board Designated Draws from Investments” in the Statement of Operating Activities. Think of this as the amount taken from the endowment (draw) to support concerts, education programs and the day-to-day business of an orchestra (operating activities). In 2008-09 and 2009-10, amounts reported on the financial statements are fairly close to those on tax forms.

But the difference in 2010-11 is just over $6 million. You read that right. The Board withdrew $12.1 million from the endowment, but only $6 million was used to run the Orchestra. I’ve scoured the financial statements and don’t know where the remaining $6.1 million was spent. The money was used somewhere – but where? Financing long-term debt? Expenses related to the Hall renovation? Why did the Board and management decide to withdraw such a large amount in 2011 and only use half for the operations of the Orchestra?

Now is a great time to reiterate that I’m not a CPA. A clarification from an accountant would be wonderful. Perhaps closer to necessary.

For those who like to verify my figures, unfortunately the audited financial statements are not available on the Orchestra’s website or on Guidestar. I’d suggest requesting a copy from the Minnesota Orchestra.

Turning To Investments

Minnesota Orchestra owns plenty of stock. In the 2010-11 and 2009-10 years, Minnesota Orchestra reported gains (or income) of $7.8 million and $2.8 million when they sold securities (Form 990, part VIII). We don’t exactly know how that income was used, but I think we can all agree that bringing in more money is a good thing.

Unfortunately, 2008-09 is again the spoiler. The Orchestra sold a large amount of stock at a $13.9 million loss. It is well known advice to buy stocks low and sell high, and the 2008 market was low as a contrabassoon. It’s possible the stock was on its way to becoming a penny stock. But why would they own such a volatile, risky stock? It could be a bad decision or bad investment advice – to the tune of almost $14 million. I know you’re ready with my next line. A review by an investment analyst would certainly help explain some things.

The Wrap-Up…And More Numbers Coming

For those who’ve stuck with me through this post, you might wonder why I spent so much time and effort on the endowment. It’s because the Orchestra’s management emphasized the shrinking endowment as a key factor in sending their books into the red. So far we’ve confirmed the endowment decreased during the recession. But we’ve also looked at faulty estimates, endowment draws not matching tax returns, some bad investment advice, and an endowment draw where only half the funds go to the work of the Orchestra. If you came here for answers…well hopefully the title gave you a hint.

There are other problems cited by management, including declining ticket revenue, musicians’ salaries, and donors’ restrictions on their gifts. But that means digging into the financials, tax forms and media statements again. Trying to digest too many numbers at once jumbles everything for me, so I’m going with manageable chunks. Check in later for the current state of Orchestral Apocalypse (thank you, Emily, for what you’ve been doing!) and for a few more facts and figures.


You’re welcome, Mary, and thank you!

So…what do you think? I’m in absolutely no position to judge; this kind of stuff is way beyond my personal sphere of expertise. (I do, however, trust Mary.) Are there any experts out there who can help to shed some light on what’s going on? Have any other patrons been looking at the documents that Mary references? If so, what did you find? Now would certainly be an excellent time to hear directly from the MOA…

You can read Part II of Mary’s series here.


Filed under Not My Writing

Even MORE Obfuscations from Minnesota Orchestra Management!

The following post contains uncontrolled levels of sarcasm. If sarcasm isn’t your thing, then please, step away now.

You’ve been warned.

Warning: Radioactive levels of angry sarcasm ahead.

If you’re a new reader, please start here. Otherwise big chunks of the following won’t make much sense, and will, in fact, sound exceptionally  b*$#@y. Actually, it may sound exceptionally b*$#@y even if you know what’s going on, but at least then you’ll know why I’m sounding b*$#@y.


I’m going to start by quoting myself from a few days ago, discussing the new Misrepresentation vs. Reality chart on management’s website:

The only interesting thing about this crap is the fact that management found it necessary to post it. Is this a sign that they’re having difficulty winning over their public? Or that they’re gearing up to pull an SPCO and cancel concerts through December 31st within the next few days, and they want to be prepared for the surge of confused PO’d patrons who will be coming to their website looking for an explanation? Who the crap knows.

Sooooooo, you know what happened yesterday! Yes, either I’m psychic, or management is laughably transparent.

So here’s the latest press release, interspersed with my (bitter) commentary…

The Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) has cancelled or rescheduled its concert performances running from Friday, November 30 through Sunday, December 23, noting that contract talks with its musicians are currently at a standstill, with the Union not yet submitting a counterproposal.

You forgot to finish the sentence. Allow me: “The Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) has cancelled or rescheduled its concert performances running from Friday, November 30 through Sunday, December 23, noting that contract talks with its musicians are currently at a standstill, with the Union not yet submitting a counterproposal, because we have not yet submitted to an independent financial analysis, despite the fact our city’s newspaper encouraged us to do so in a major editorial, and, despite the fact that, bewilderingly, the publisher of this newspaper is actually on our board of directors, and despite the fact that we linked to this major editorial on our website, thereby tacitly endorsing it, and yes I know this makes absolutely no logical sense whatsoever, but we abandoned logic a long time ago, so get used to it, and also we are never ever ever answering any questions about what we’re doing, ever, no matter how politely or rudely or persistently you ask, so STOP ASKING QUESTIONS AND EXPECTING A BASIC LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY, OKAY??????”


“We are very disappointed that we are no closer to an agreement today than we were in April,” said Minnesota Orchestra Board Chair Jon Campbell.  “In consideration of the needs of audiences, guest artists and our performance venue to make alternate plans for the holiday season, we feel we have no choice but to cancel performances through December 23. We make this decision with heavy hearts, and once again ask our musicians to return to the negotiating table with a substantive proposal so our concert schedule can resume as soon as possible.”

Yes, extremely heavy hearts, I’m sure. Hearts made out of…

*clears throat*

(Also I think it’s hilarious that Campbell thinks this early cancellation will be somehow be a service to their guest artists, and enable them to make “alternate plans.” Um, no. Not really. It’s extremely difficult to get gigs on this short of notice. It’s unclear whether Campbell understands this. I don’t think he does. Honestly, why should he? He’s doing a zillion other things right now; his prime focus isn’t the orchestra. It never has been. Never will be.)

(I would also love to know if management is legally obligated to pay their guest artists for their canceled performances, or if some clause was inserted that kept the MOA from having to pay them in the event of a strike or a lockout…)

Contract talks between the MOA and its musicians, who are members of the Twin Cities Musicians’ Union (Local 30-73), began on April 12.  The MOA’s final proposal offers a total package averaging $119,000, including an average salary of $89,000 with $30,000 in benefits per musician.  The proposal also includes 10 weeks of paid vacation and up to 26 weeks of paid sick leave.

Ugh, for crap’s sake. I’ve already debunked this “paid vacation” and “sick leave” stuff, and still you keep regurgitating it. We’re not baby birds, thanks. We’re sentient human adults who can think for ourselves…and even Google things! (Shocking, I know.) Once again, the proposed base salary is $78,000. Musicians don’t have ten weeks of paid vacation; they play every single day of their lives; “vacation” is merely “weeks they don’t play with orchestra.” Musicians also don’t have sick leave; they have injury leave. Obfuscation obfuscation obfuscation blah blah blah nothing new nothing new nothing new ever ever ever.

Musicians have never put forward a counterproposal, but have instead called for the Board to submit to binding arbitration, to conduct an independent financial audit, or to engage in “pay and play.”

Sorry, but I can’t help but laugh at this. “Pay and play“? Love the alliteration there; very catchy! Did you focus group that? Did someone decide that the phrase “play and talk” sounded too reasonable? Did someone finally tell you in the orchestral world, “playing and talking” can’t technically happen while a contract is still in place? Did you realize that the whole music world was laughing and pointing at you? Who knows. But it makes me giggle – bitterly – to think of these discussions even happening. But the bizarre thing is, they had to have

*imagination runs wild*

CAMPBELL: The musicians say they want to play and talk? No, no, no. That sounds much too reasonable. I believe we have a slight PR problem on our hands. Nothing unmanageable, but I think we need to re-brand, come up with another phrase for that. Anybody? Henson, what do you have?

HENSON: I’m not quite sure, sir. How about something about how if we allow them to play, the musicians will slowly but surely suck the lifeblood out of a once-mighty organization?

DAVIS: No. Not catchy enough. We need something catchy. *phone rings* Just a minute, guys; Pawlenty’s on the other line… *exits room*

CAMPBELL: That’s your job, Henson. Come up with a phrase. Got to be shorter. You heard what Davis said. Give it some zazz.

HENSON: Zazz, sir? (thinks) Perhaps something with alliteration?

CAMPBELL: Hey, I like that! Excellent idea. Yes, I think we could turn this whole thing around with some alliteration. Get on that, Henson.

What’s your favorite Orwellian phrase from the orchestral apocalypse? So far we have “vital holiday festival”, “market reset”, and “pay and play.” I’m sure we’ll get more as the weeks – sorry, months – go on. (Oh, yeah. You heard me right. I called it. After today, I don’t feel as if this will end until the fall of 2013, at the earliest. Somebody please prove me wrong. PLEASE.)

“Moving to a ‘pay and play’ agreement following our contract’s expiration would result in our organization continuing to incur significant operating losses,” said Minnesota Orchestra President and CEO Michael Henson. “We simply cannot continue operating under the terms of a contract our community cannot afford.”

Quick question: can our community afford Michael Henson? Shouldn’t the greatest orchestra in the world have the greatest orchestra CEO in the word? Can anyone on the face of this earth make a remotely cogent case that Michael Henson is one of the great orchestra CEOs in the world? I’m dead serious here. Anyone? The comment section is open!!

The board turned down the players’ suggestion of binding arbitration, noting that it is highly unusual to turn to arbitration to settle a contract dispute when one party has yet to engage in negotiations by submitting a proposal.

Other things that are highly unusual: gay Republicans, Linux, two-headed calves, demonstrative Scandinavians, and disabled 23-year-olds who get international attention for their blogging about the Minnesota Orchestra’s series of epic failures of mismanagement. And yet, strangely, all of these things exist. Is that really your best defense of your refusal to go through binding arbitration? “It is highly unusual”?

Cue Barney Frank again: “On what planet do you spend most of your time?” How do you even engage with these kinds of intellectually lazy arguments? You don’t. You mock them.

The Board has been supportive of involving a neutral third party in the contract talks, however, and a Federal Mediator is overseeing the negotiations.  Every year the MOA undergoes an independent audit and previous years’ audited financials have all been shared with musicians.   The MOA is currently undergoing an independent audit for F2012 which will be shared with musicians upon its completion.

But that’s actually different from an independent financial analysis, because an independent financial analysis would include other –

Oh, *(#*$(#*$@# it. They know the difference; they’re businessmen. They just don’t give a crap. They just want to manipulate all the poor souls who take their line as gospel. *cracks open a beer* *downs it*

A Painful Time for All
“This is a very painful time for Orchestra leadership, musicians and all Minnesotans who love classical music,” said MOA Negotiations Committee Chair Richard Davis.

Aww. Yes. Yes, I’m sure it is painful for you. Very very painful. Heartwrenching. However, it’s slightly more painful for certain individuals…like the people who aren’t being paid, have no health insurance, and are currently seeking jobs in other states or countries. It’s a little insulting – okay, INCREDIBLY UNBELIEVABLY SCREAMWORTHILY INSULTING! – to suggest that the pain that the board is feeling is in ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM ~~~REMOTELY SIMILAR~~~ to the pain the musicians are feeling. O.M.G. That would be like me going up to a double amputee and saying sympathetically, “I know what you’re going through. I stubbed my toe once.” NO. NO. NO. That is TOTALLY. INAPPROPRIATE.

“It is the Board’s role to safeguard the Orchestra for the long term so that it may serve our community for many decades to come as an artistically great and financially solvent organization.

Really? Fascinating. Because I’ve seen absolutely no indication whatsoever that the Board wants to safeguard the orchestra. Instead, I see a Board of wealthy out-of-touch people who appear to know very little about how major orchestras work, who are drunk on the ambrosia of their own power, who are treating an internationally renowned cultural institution in much the same way spoiled children would treat their own personal sandbox, who worship ideology at the expense of reality, and who are consistently – obstinately – avoiding all calls for public accountability, no matter how loud those cries grow.

Funny how your perspective changes what you see, isn’t it?

The fact is if we continue to draw down our endowment at the current rate, which is more than three times what is considered sustainable, to fund a contract we cannot afford, the MOA endowment will be depleted by 2018 and the future of the Minnesota Orchestra will be in jeopardy.  We believe that our community deserves a solution, and we hope that our musicians will come back to the table at their earliest possible convenience.”

I hope you guys allow your musicians to address you at your earliest possible convenience, too. Oh, you didn’t – ? Despite the fact the mayor and city council advised you to? Oh. Well… That was…charitable…

In 2011, the Minnesota Orchestra posted a $2.9 million deficit, the largest in the Orchestra’s history, and the organization anticipates an operating loss near $6 million for Fiscal 2012, for which an independent audit is currently underway.

(Why do I imagine this being read in a tone of excited relish?) *shakes this heretical thought*

The musicians’ 2007 contract, which expired on October 1, 2012, included an increase of 19.2 percent to musician base salary over the life of the five-year contract.

(Psst. You signed this contract. And even expressed confidence that you’d be able to balance the budget with it in place. Just wanted to remind you. Because from the way you’re talking, I think you might have forgotten.)

The Orchestra’s Board fulfilled that contractual obligation to musicians by taking additional draws from the organization’s endowment.

*sound of screeching brakes* Wait. Stop. Stop everything.

Are you really trying to garner sympathy from me by pointing out that you fulfilled your contractual obligations? A contractual obligation you okayed, by the way? Is that our standard now? That’s like a wife saying, “Look at how smoking hot that man is! I resisted the urge to sleep with him. Aren’t I a wonderful person for keeping my marriage vows?” … What? I hate to break it to you, but, um, no. You aren’t a wonderful person for doing that. At all.

Hey, guess what? As a professional violinist, when I sign a contract to play at someone’s wedding, I invariably show up and play the wedding. Everyone, praise how responsible I am!

Concert Detail
All ticketholders to December concerts will be directly contacted by the Orchestra to outline ticketing options.   “We have sought to give our ticketholders advance notice around these concert cancellations in order to allow them time to make alternate plans during a busy holiday entertainment season,” said Henson. “We’ve also tried to reschedule as many of the performers as possible in December 2013, so that our patrons still have the opportunity to see these popular artists.”

Oh, how generous of you, Mr. Henson! I wonder how many of your musicians will have the opportunity to back up these popular artists? I wonder if you care? Because I’m not really getting the vibe that you particularly give a crap. Say what you will about me – I’m rude – mean – sarcastic – over-dramatic – a total B – but nobody in their right mind would accuse me of not caring. I do this out of love. I do it out of passion for this organization. I do it for free. You, on the other hand…

So. Bottom line: if you wanted to hear holiday music played by the Minnesota Orchestra this season, you’re out of luck. In fact, you were a naive sucker to guess those concerts would take place. You gullible, gullible fool.

An aural representation of the 2012 holiday season in the Twin Cities music scene

More substantial analysis coming later. Sorry; this was mainly a venting post. It’s not going to change anything, or persuade anybody, or contribute to any constructive discussion. I probably shouldn’t even have published it. But for crap’s sake, this whole thing is so ridiculous. Permit me some venting time, please.

Also, if any members of management are reading this – and I know you are – I hope you’re satisfied that you made the disabled girl whose life was forever changed by the musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra to go to bed last night weeping uncontrollably. My heart broke in half. Split down the middle. And it wasn’t because of the crisis itself; it was how you’ve chosen to respond to it. It was because of your cold-hearted callousness, and your complete inability to regard the musicians – or concerned patrons – or me – as sentient human beings. It was devastating to realize that the powerful among us have apparently no empathy or sympathy or humanity, or concern for anyone but themselves. What a void of leadership. I will hold you accountable for this. And I vow here, very publicly, that I will fight you, kicking and screaming, until I can drag some answers out of you.

This will, eventually, pass. Who knows who will still be here by the time it passes, or who will get paid what when it passes, but it will, eventually, pass. (I don’t think Henson could earn his $400,000 salary for more than, say, two years without somebody stepping in…do you? *gets nervous wondering*) Anyway. I can guarantee you that the men and women who run the orchestra of the future will look back on this whole lockout and use you as a shining example of what not to do and how not to act. If you want to be remembered that way…cool, I guess. Whatever. It’s your legacy, not mine. (Although I do have to say, the longer your stubbornness drags on, the more famous I get, so I do have to thank you for that…) But I can’t begin to fathom why you’d want this stain of mismanagement on your resume…or your conscience. Everyone is pointing at you and staring in horror. You are a train wreck. And the worst part is, judging from your public statements, you don’t even know it.

What you think you are

What you actually are

Some last minute addenda that came up after I finished the essay. but which didn’t warrant their own entry…

Michael Henson isn’t really bothered by musicians leaving, judging by this MPR article. He says that he can’t stop musicians who choose to leave. (Um…I’d hope he couldn’t stop them… They’re not under house arrest in Henson’s basement……..I don’t think……….) He’s convinced that a major reason musicians will want to be in Minneapolis – and I am not making this up – is because Minneapolis is “very easy to get around.” If you put your basic humanity away for a moment, and forget the upheaval his behavior has caused, his total disconnect from and denial of reality is almost as entertaining as Karl Rove’s on election night. (Almost.) He also – apparently unconsciously – raises an interesting point when he says, “It is one of the truly great communities of America and the world to live in.” Of course that begs the question: shouldn’t a world-class community be able to support a world-class orchestra? Question: how can you get a world-class orchestra when no sane world-class player wants to join us? (Oh, but I forgot: Minneapolis is easy to get around. Yes, the leaders of the organization may consistently disrespect the contributions of musicians, but at least musicians can take buses and enjoy bike paths once in a while…)

Here are some closing words that ought to serve a rallying cry for us all…

That simple single paragraph says more than I’ve said this whole entry, and more eloquently, too.

Ball is in your court, management. Try explaining why you won’t undergo an independent financial analysis or go through binding arbitration to a sobbing eight-year-old. I’ll wait.


Filed under My Writing

Misrepresentation, Reality…Misrepresentation of Reality

~ Preface ~

If you’re a first-time reader, I highly highly highly recommend that you mosey over to this post, If you’re just joining us…, to get all the relevant details about who I am, what I’m doing, and where the Minnesota Orchestra negotiations are at right now. Otherwise big chunks of the following won’t make much sense.

This blog has been criticized – and occasionally rightly so – for overuse of sarcasm. Well, if sarcasm isn’t your thing, then you’ll want to look away now, because this entry is loaded with it.  That being said, until Minnesota management gets serious, I’m not particularly interested in being serious, either. The time for joke charts like this one is over. It’s time for some real answers. And if you don’t give them to me, then I’m going to Release The Snark! What else am I supposed to do? Reason calmly and politely and rationally? I – and many other patrons – have already tried that. And it didn’t work. Like, at all. So I dunno. Might as well turn up the sarcasm?

I’d also like to say – once again – that I do not speak for the musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra. I have never spoken for the musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra and I will never speak for the musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra. I speak solely for myself. If we often share perspectives, then so be it, but keep in mind that’s incidental. We are totally separate entities. They never pressure me to say anything, and even if they did, I wouldn’t listen to them. I say what I say how I want to say it when I want to say it. So if you’re going to criticize this entry, or the tone of this entry, then remember the criticism belongs squarely at my feet. Not an ounce of it should go to them. Because they’re better wiser human beings than I am, and they consistently take the high road, while I routinely veer off into the brambles of angry, cranky, frustrated snark.

Now for our feature presentation…


What’s that, you say? Minnesota Orchestra management has some new information up on their website?

*heart rate spikes*

*face flushes*

*do you think they’ll answer any of my questions???*


*gallops along to read, excited to finally get some answers!*

*reads document*

*heart rate slows*

*becomes ridiculously disappointed*

*resists urge to get drunk*

*pounds wall in frustration*

*searches Google Images for “FRUSTRATION”*


Here it is, in all its irrelevant, completely unhelpful glory. It’s a two-column chart called “Misrepresentation vs. Reality.”

Deep, man. Cuz I mean…what is reality, really? Do we really know? Like, really?

I love how we’re all tip-toeing over the word everyone’s thinking but nobody’s actually saying. I say obfuscation; you say misrepresentation; we both mean another word entirely…am I right? Anyway. Let’s get to analyzing. I’ll copy/paste the Misrepresentation and Reality, and then counter with my own Misrepresentation of Reality. Then management (assuming they ever acknowledge I exist) can come back with a “No, That Misrepresentation of Reality Is Really A Misrepresentation of Reality.” Or, whatever.

Here goes:

Misrepresentation: The Minnesota Orchestral Association’s (MOA’s) contract proposal calls for salary cuts of up to 50%.

Reality: The proposed salary cuts in the current proposal range from 20 to 40% with the vast majority under 35%. (Specifically, 70% of the musicians would see salary cuts of less than 35%.)

The current proposal offers an average annual salary of $89,000 plus ten weeks paid vacation, and additional benefits averaging $30,000 per musician (including healthcare and pension), for a total package of $119,000.

Misrepresentation of Reality: “The vast majority” are “under 35%”? Oh, well, that’s not so bad, then! I guess I’ll put away my picket sign. Twenty to forty percent of someone’s paycheck is chump change. So chump-ish, in fact, that, if Michael Henson took that pay cut, he’d only lose out on a mere $80,000 to $160,000 a year. I’m sure he’d swallow such a cut easily, without any resistance whatsoever. Especially since there are so few orchestra CEO positions available in the world today, and since he’d have such difficulty finding work elsewhere.

I’m going to sound a bit like a broken record here. As I’ve said before, keep in mind the difference in base versus average salaries (the proposed base is $78,000); both numbers should be considered. As I’ve said before, musicians don’t have vacation weeks, ever; only weeks in which they do not perform with the orchestra. As I’ve said before, take everything from both sides with not just a grain of salt, but a salt mine.

The more I read about this topic, the more I realize I can’t state with any certainty what numbers are accurate. Especially not when we’re talking about the massive fiscal infrastructure of a major American symphony orchestra. And especially especially not when the numbers come from management, since they have a long – and apparently proud – history of obfuscation. However, I am well aware that just like Bible verses, numbers can be massaged to say whatever the crap you want them to. (Exhibit A.) And since management routinely obfuscates about the things I do understand, like musician “vacation time”, then that makes me feel as if they’re also obfuscating about the things I don’t understand, like their financial status. That’s just common sense. If someone obfuscates about one thing, what’s to keep them from obfuscating about another? So they’ll really need to step up their game to get me to believe them.

So let’s keep reading and see if they do that…

Misrepresentation: The MOA turned down three musician contract proposals.

Reality: Musicians have not presented a single contract proposal since negotiations began in April.

The three “proposals” provided by musicians—to play and talk, to submit to binding arbitration and to conduct an independent financial analysis—are not contract proposals.

Misrepresentation of Reality: But…binding arbitration would have resulted in a new contract, right? If I offer to do something that’s guaranteed to end in a contract, then that’s basically a contract proposal. IMHO. If I tie a ring box around the neck of my boyfriend’s dog and push the dog into the room where my boyfriend is sitting, I’m not saying out loud “please marry me,” but the intent is obvious: I’m making a proposal of marriage. If an orchestra offers to go through binding arbitration, then their intent is obvious. Correct?

Misrepresentation: The MOA is refusing to share specifics on the Orchestra’s finances with musicians.

Reality: Board and management have been communicating the financial position of the Orchestra with musicians for three years.

In addition, the Orchestra’s Negotiating Committee has provided more than 1,200 pages of information to the Musician Negotiating Committee in the past six months, including the independently audited financial statements.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Oh, I see. So the board and management have been communicating the financial position of the Orchestra with the musicians for three whole years…just not with the public or with the press. *thumbs up* My confidence in you is soaring…like the Hindenburg! (To borrow a famous quote from Colbert.)

There is nothing in the “reality” spiel about incomplete and misleading numbers, which, to the best of my understanding, is the crux of the issue. Number of pages tells me nothing. Nada. Zilch. I could easily print out 1200 pages of documents about the sorry state of my finances and still not reveal to you how much is actually in my savings account ($5, if you’re interested). Also, notice: no word about the already approved budget that they are apparently refusing to release. And no word about the mysterious vanished article from 2010 that says how well they’re doing. No word, no word, no word. The rest is silence, et cetera.

Misrepresentation: The audited financial information shared was from Fiscal 2011 and is out of date.

Reality: The Fiscal 2011 financials are the most current audited figures available.

Our most recent fiscal year ended in August and our 2012 independent audit is now underway. Those figures, too, will be shared with musicians when the audit is complete.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Dunno the exact truth here (and if you do know anything, please don’t tell me – unless you want to go on the record; I really really don’t want to get stuck in the middle of discussions about numbers I can’t verify), but this is what Ellen Dinwiddie Smith said in the Matt Peiken MNuet interview… (5:29 in)

MP: Ellen, you also told me, and I want you to talk about this a little more, you mentioned that to date, you have not seen…as an orchestra, you have not been shown the books, let alone your request to have an independent auditor look at them. Is that true, that the musicians have not seen the books?

EDS: This is true. We have repeatedly called for a joint independent financial analysis, and they have refused to do that. We have given the papers that we were given to people who have looked at them and basically told us that everything they’ve given us is so contradictory to each other that it doesn’t make sense.

So…take from that exchange what you will. Pretty impossible for those of us on the outside to understand all the subtleties of what’s going on here, I think. Nonetheless, management doesn’t once address the musicians’ central allegation: that there are contradictory numbers at play.

Misrepresentation: MOA’s refusal to “play and talk” signals an intention to create a second-rate orchestra.

Reality: After six months of playing and talking without a single counter-proposal from the musicians, Orchestra management concluded that continuing to repeat that activity would only result in more unproductive discussions and costly delays. A “play and talk” agreement incurs monthly operating losses for our organization of $500,000.

Preserving the future of an exceptional Orchestra for generations of music lovers is our highest priority. We await a counter-proposal from the musicians so we can resume negotiations and reach a settlement as quickly as possible.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Hey, guys. I know it’s hard for you, but let’s get real for a brief moment. The idea of the “playing and talking” period being while the musicians were still legally obligated to play…that’s just such a ridiculously ludicrous notion, and so far outside the definition of the phrase “playing and talking” in the orchestral world, that I don’t even know what to say. Barney Frank said it best: “On what planet do you spend most of your time? Trying to have a conversation with you would be like trying to argue with a dining room table; I have no interest in doing it.” And you know what? He’s right. To be perfectly honest, I have no idea why I’m giving this chart the time of day. It’s ridiculous and useless and irrelevant. This is the Dick Morris of charts. At a certain point, you stop reading for information and start reading for the sheer entertainment value.

But we’ve gotten this far. So let’s keep going… Maybe we’ll be surprised by a flash of insight…

Misrepresentation: Most of the musicians will leave if this contract is approved.

Reality: We believe our musicians remain committed to this organization and community, and hope they will choose to remain.

Other major orchestras across the country who have undergone a market reset have not seen significant departures from their players.

These orchestras still report a high number of qualified candidates applying for positions that do become available.

Misrepresentation of Reality: That Kool-Aid must taste awfully delicious. While you’re drinking, you might be interested in checking out what happened to the principals in Detroit after their own orchestral apocalypse. Here’s a little taste.

Also, clever clever clever use of the word “most.” No, “most” probably won’t leave…but “a lot” certainly could. Especially our principals. Who are some of the very best in the business. Heck, one could easily argue that we’ve already lost Sarah Kwak over this. She and her husband – also an Orchestra violinist – saw this coming. I wouldn’t be surprised if that knowledge factored heavily in their decision to leave for Oregon.

Also also…”undergoing a market reset.” Ha. Hey, while we’re throwing around chilling Orwellian phrases, here are some of my personal favorites: “Ministry of Plenty” – “Newspeak” – “Ignorance is Strength” – and “no animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.”

Note that once again, there is no concern at all, whatsoever, for THESE particular musicians, for these individuals, for these hearts and souls, and for the relationships the community has with them. The callousness verges on entertaining…if it wasn’t so cruel. The relationships they’ve built with community members – particularly, with children and young people – are not easily replaceable. I know this will come as a shock to some of you, but there are other consequences to this conflict besides economic ones. And you’ve yet to address those.

Orchestra member Manny Laureano is a co-artistic director and conductor at the Minnesota Youth Symphonies. If he’s anything like my youth symphony conductors, he is hugely influential, and his example brightens hundreds of kids’ lives. When he announces his departure for greener pastures, I defy you to walk up to every single student that he has led and inspired over the years in the Twin Cities, and reassure them that “well, a high number of qualified candidates are applying for Mr. Laureano’s now-vacant seat, so don’t worry, kids! That’s just what happens during market resets!” I dare you to do this. Orch dorks may not look threatening, but I think you’d be surprised by the reaction you’d get. Repeat a scene like this for every single individual who leaves the orchestra due to the behavior of management. Behind every single departed musician, I guarantee you will find a wake of depressed fans, students, friends, co-workers…maybe even families. These are holes that cannot be mended quickly or easily…if ever. Poking open those holes is not a task that should be taken likely. And when it does need to be done, it needs to be done with empathy, sympathy, and respect. None of which you’ve shown. Ever.

For future reference, this is how an emotionally intelligent person would answer the question “will musicians leave?”

Yes, there is a danger that some will leave. We regret that our community cannot afford to pay them the salary they could earn elsewhere. We respect these individuals’ decisions to seek work elsewhere. We are proud of them and the amazing work they’ve done in the Twin Cities, and we wish them well as they seek better-paying jobs in other communities. We can only hope that their replacements will live up to the high standards they have set.

In other words…… R-E-S-P-E-C-T!!! Find out what it means to me! (And plus it’s to-tal-ly free!) You can sing along with a karaoke version here! (Actually, the lyrics to this entire song are hilariously applicable to this entire debacle, and I really recommend taking a break from this blog to belt them out. It will be therapeutic.)

Misrepresentation: The Orchestra Board raised money to renovate Orchestra Hall that should have been used to pay musicians.

Reality: The funds for renovating Orchestra Hall are part of a larger $110 million campaign which began in 2005.

The majority of these contributions ($60 million) are being used for two purposes: to build the future endowment, which will continue to fund musician compensation, and to support artistic initiatives (like touring and recording).

Misrepresentation: The MOA should now use the funds raised for Orchestra Hall to support its musicians instead.

Reality: Our donors had a choice over which component of our $110 million campaign they wished to support.

Some donors (corporate, foundation and individual) prefer to give one-time capital gifts that come with naming options.

The funds raised for the renovation of Orchestra Hall are restricted for that purpose and cannot be diverted for other uses.

For example: $14 million in bonding support from the State of Minnesota must be used for this capital project and cannot be used for ongoing operations. In order to draw down these funds, the Orchestra has met a requirement for a 2 to 1 match with funding from private and corporate supporters.



Look, I don’t think anyone is saying “Stop the renovation in its tracks and give that money to musicians!” No. We’re objecting to the picture you painted in 2010 and earlier, in which you were “a beacon institution” among “bad economic news.” We’re wondering if people would have donated to the hall construction effort if they’d known such massive pay cuts were coming. In other words, if you guys had told us in 2010 about the impending pay cuts, would you have raised enough money for the hall? That’s what we’re asking. But you’re not answering. Hello! Is anyone home? Anyone? It’s not that complicated a question!

Misrepresentation: The MOA has money to pay the musicians—it just doesn’t want to.

Reality: The Orchestra has paid musicians’ salaries over the last several years by making additional draws from its endowment. The draw rate was three times higher than a sustainable level in 2011 (17% vs 5%).

That’s like taking money out of a 401k to pay normal living expenses. The more that’s pulled now, the less there is for the future.

If we continue to draw from our endowment at our current rate, the MOA endowment will be depleted by 2018.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Groovy, cool beans, awesomesauce. How about you prove this to us by submitting to a joint independent financial analysis? Like this Star Tribune editorial said you should? The very same Star Tribune editorial that you posted a link to on your website? In the words of Reagan and the Star Tribune, “trust but verify.”

Or is Reagan too much of a union-loving commie pinko lefty for you?

Look, even if the numbers come back as total exact duplicates to your independent audits…well, hey, at least you’ll have shut the musicians – and us patrons – up for a while. And I mean, you’ve got to admit, we’re frigging obnoxious.

Misrepresentation: The musicians already took a pay cut in 2009.

Reality: The musicians agreed to a one year wage freeze in 2009. They did not offer to take a cut in salary.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Um, that’s actually not how you characterized it in 2010… “At the same time, Henson negotiated modifications to the musicians’ contract, resulting in around $4.2m in cost savings up to 2012 – mostly through salary and pension reductions, and a wage freeze in FY2010.” (That “winning article” just keeps on giving and giving. My goodness. No wonder Henson wants it removed from the face of the earth.) That’s also not what you told the Star Tribune in August 2009: “Musicians at the Minnesota Orchestra have agreed to concessions in the face of financial pressures on the organization… The plan involves pay cuts totaling $1.8 million.”

What am I missing?

Misrepresentation: The musicians offered to take more cuts but were rebuffed by management.

Reality: The musicians did not offer to take any cuts.

They did offer to defer salary increases in exchange for extending the current contract an additional two years. However, this would have further depleted our endowment and put off the problem, not solved it.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Fascinating! Of course this had absolutely nothing to do with the fact the SPCO’s contract would be up for expiration in 2012. And it has nothing to do with the fact that an overworked local media wouldn’t be able to keep track of both stories. And it has nothing to do with the fact that major contracts were coming up in Atlanta and Indianapolis and Cleveland and Chicago and St. Paul, and at least three of those were likely to be settled with sharply concessionary contracts. No…nothing whatsoever to do with any of those things. It was all 100% concern over the health of the organization and the endowment. Mmmhmm.

*tinfoil hat crinkles*

(Of course I have no proof of this, and I can’t imagine we’ll ever get proof from management. But it’s not very hard to read the writing on the wall, and wonder. And since they’ve never addressed it…)

Misrepresentation: Management hasn’t taken any cuts internally.

Reality: In fact, staffing costs have been lean for many years. Over the last decade, all costs in the organization—minus musician costs—have decreased by 6%. In that same time period, musicians’ costs have increased by 26%.

Since the start of the 2007 musician’s contract—during which time the players received a 19.2% increase to base salary—the management and administrative team has taken a salary reduction, a wage freeze and had their pension contributions from the MOA reduced by more than 40%. This includes the president.

The size of the staff has decreased by 20% since 2009 due to layoffs.

Misrepresentations of Reality: I think a guest blogger (or two) may eventually have something to say about this. I think you’d be surprised by the…tenaciousness, shall we say, of certain patrons. So stay tuned. And stop belittling us.

Is anyone saying that management hasn’t taken any cuts internally? Because we all know that people have been fired, and fired brutally. In fact, that’s actually one of our concerns! Take a listen to what Ellen Dinwiddie Smith said in the Peiken interview (at 29:30).

What happened when they fired our staff…right before they closed the hall this summer…we had several staff members who were actually told that morning. They were brought into an office, and as they were being brought into the office, their computer passwords were changed, and they were told they had to leave the building. They were escorted out of the building and they were allowed to come back some time later and pick up their things. These are people who had worked at the orchestra twenty years, some of them just like at the stage door. There was no reason to make that kind of a layoff because they knew they were going to get laid off or whatever in a week or two weeks when the hall closed, but the Association staged it in such a way that, oh, we had to do this, you know, big layoff thing.

Soooooooo. Is this true? Why aren’t you addressing this allegation? Do you still want to talk about cuts in management, or would you like to move onto another subject?

Here’s a question: if this is true, then what the actual [bleep]? What possessed you? Who on earth decided this was okay? This isn’t how we do things in Minnesota.

This also is a phrase that interests me: “This includes the president.” Then whassup with this? $390,000 in 2009 and $404,000 in 2011-ish? Even if Michael Henson’s total compensation, including benefits, somehow did go down, it sure as crap doesn’t look like it went down 20-40%. Also, how about this article? “For the big guns, nonprofits with budgets of $25 million to $50 million, the median CEO compensation was $243,000 at the top tier.” Thoughts? Explanation? Justification? Rebuttals? Apologies?

No. Crickets.

One more thing: I’d imagine the decrease in the size of the staff was at least partially due to the fact that your hall is under renovation, and you had to let some people go while you were away. Correct? And yet…no mention of that here. Obfuscations obfuscations obfuscations. At this point I’m realizing it would have been easier to point out the things in this chart that are true, rather than pointing out the things that are misleading. Oh, well; we’re too far along now. Let’s keep going…

Misrepresentation: MOA doesn’t want any assistance from a third party to break the stalemate.

Reality: Orchestra management strongly supports an independent party involved in negotiations, and a federal mediator is participating in our negotiations.

It is highly unusual to suggest arbitration in a negotiation in which one side has not put forward even a single proposal.

Final and binding arbitration provides no assurance that the Orchestra’s financial instability would be solved, even in the short term.

At best, it would delay needed changes for many months while the arbitration unfolds. The Orchestra would incur significant operating losses with each month’s delay.

Misrepresentation of Reality: OK, so I know that every orchestra is local, and every orchestral meltdown is unique in its own way (“each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”). And we could probably have a long in-depth discussion about why (if you would bother discussing anything with anybody in-depth, which you won’t). But here’s a question: why do you think that the managements at Louisville and Detroit even entertained the idea of binding arbitration for more than five seconds, if it didn’t provide any assurance of financial stability, even in the short term? Were those leaders just being reckless? Were they desperate? Stupid? Or do you think that your financial position and outlook are even worse than theirs? If so, why? Because our arts scene is envied across the country. And I think the folks in power at Louisville and Detroit would have killed to be in this generous, thriving, well-educated community.

Misrepresentation: The Orchestra’s endowment has been mismanaged.

Reality: On the contrary, the MOA Endowment has exceeded investment return benchmarks over the last five years.

The critical issue is that we have taken additional draws from our endowment in order to fund the 2007 musicians’ contract—and this has reduced the endowment’s value. In short, we have less money to invest because of the salaries from the previous contract.

Our organization needs to learn to live within the means of a 5% investment draw, to ensure the endowment can grow and support the Orchestra in the future.

Misrepresentation of Reality: FYI, in case you’ve forgotten, the musicians didn’t unilaterally impose a contract in 2007: you guys agreed to it, too. If that contract is the only thing that went wrong, you deserve blame, as well. In 2007, orchestra board chairman Paul Grangaard said, “We have a three-year plan to break even, and we’re confident we’re going to achieve that.” (Mr. Grangaard is still listed as being on the Board of Directors.) So don’t give me this crap that it’s solely the musicians’ fault and you had absolutely nothing to do with it and you have no idea who on earth okayed all these crushing fiscal obligations.

Also: what is the definition of “mismanagement”? It could be anything from “fraud” to “slightly under-performing the market,” really. Depends on who you ask.

Two questions. First question: is this bit from the musicians’ website false? “Board Chair Jon Campbell expressed regret at the Board and Management’s handling of the endowment funds over the past ten years, noting that they had been unhappy with the advice they had acted upon and had to change investment advisers. Campbell also admitted that the Board and Management had been wrong in 2007 regarding their investment predictions.” Second question: why the switch in independent investment consultants? You said yourself a few days ago that you switched: “In 2010, a new independent investment consultant, Cambridge Associates, was hired to manage the portfolio.” Answer those two questions honestly, and then maybe we could get past the posturing and strutting and puffing and begin to discuss this like adults.

Let’s get past this. It’s not impressing anybody.

Misrepresentation: MOA leaders created the organization’s strategic plan in secret and the plan reflects no interest in artistry, community service, education or marketing.

Reality: Musicians were participants in creating the artistic and community outreach portions of the strategic plan, since this is their area of expertise. Likewise the board and management created the financial portions of the plan.

As part of the strategic planning process, the board openly shared the Orchestra’s financial situation with musicians in a series of meetings spanning three years.

The complete plan—including sections on artistic achievement and community outreach—is available online, and includes many initiatives relating towards international touring, recording, broadcasting, and new community outreach programs

Misrepresentation of Reality: First off, please please please stop touting the fact that you were telling the musicians how terribly you were doing financially, when you weren’t telling us. This only reminds us of your fundamentally disingenuous nature. I feel like my husband cheated on me for three years with a woman named Nicole, and, worse, that he keeps insisting he’s trustworthy by saying, “But I was faithful to Nicole the whole time!You’re. Not. Helping.

Second, the “complete strategic plan” is utter poppycock, full of phrases that are so vague and cliched as to render them practically meaningless. “New concert formats”? “Explore new earned income streams”? “Vital holiday festivals”? What in the name of crap is a “vital holiday festival”? Let me check Google…

Oh. Well, maybe Google Image Search will be more helpful – ?


Those are the first three results when you look up “vital holiday festival” on Google Image Search. Unfortunately, this doesn’t clear up my confusion, or answer my questions. And neither does management. So I’m still in the dark.

Look, you can’t write a “complete strategic guide” for a major symphony orchestra in a glossy thirty page document full of pretty pictures and sentence fragments. The idea of that is absurd. A real comprehensive strategic plan would be difficult nuts and bolts work, requiring substantial input from the community, and it would take hundreds upon hundreds of pages to debate, define, and implement. And you haven’t released those pages. I don’t even know if they exist! Right now I kinda doubt they do.

And that’s not even touching on the changed mission statement. Here’s the old one:

Our mission is to enrich and inspire our community as a symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.

Our mission will be implemented by:

  • Enhancing the traditional core of concerts with innovative approaches to programming and format;
  • Providing the finest educational and outreach programs;
  • Representing and promoting the Minnesota Orchestra and the State of Minnesota to audiences across the state, across the country and around the world through tours and electronic media;
  • Maintaining an acoustically superior hall with a welcoming environment.

Here’s the new one:

The Minnesota Orchestral Association inspires, educates and serves our community through internationally recognized performances of exceptional music delivered within a sustainable financial structure.

End statement. Something’s missing in that second one that’s very prominent in the first. I can’t quite put my finger on it… Something about “an orchestra”, maybe? Question: why take the word orchestra out of an orchestra’s mission statement?

Misrepresentation: MOA’s proposal includes a dramatic shift in healthcare costs to musicians.

Reality: In the proposed contract, the musicians will participate in the same medical plan that covers management and administration.

Even with this change, the MOA will make an average annual contribution towards family medical coverage of $17,250 per employee, almost twice the national average.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Um, yeah. Quick question… Are you aware that the “reality” you just gave didn’t even address the misrepresentation?

I ask this in all sincerity: Do you think we’re dumb? Because I’m getting the vibe you think we’re dumb. But the thing is, we aren’t dumb. And we get really annoyed when you treat us like we’re dumb. Because we aren’t, in fact, dumb.

Misrepresentation: Musicians have collected more than 7,000 signatures supporting their position.

Reality: None of the petitions provide any specifics on the contract negotiations. The current petition online reads “Minnesota deserves artistic excellence. I support keeping world-class musicians in the Minnesota Orchestra so that all Minnesotans may continue to enjoy extraordinary music.”

Orchestra leaders support that position. Preserving extraordinary music for generations is the core of the proposed contract and the Orchestra’s five-year strategic plan.

Misrepresentation of Reality: Well, duh. Nobody is going to sign a petition if they have to read a 50-page contract full of indecipherable legalese first. But I can guarantee you, the people who signed do support one thing: they support keeping these particular world-class musicians in Minneapolis. And orchestra leaders simply don’t support that position. And don’t tell me they do; Davis and Campbell themselves have said they’re expecting turnover, and they seem awfully cool with it. Also, there’s that old maxim: “actions speak louder than words.” Pretend you’re management. If you really wanted to keep these musicians in town, would you treat them the way management has been treating these musicians? No. Of course not. We’re Minnesotans. (Well…I’m from western Wisconsin, but that’s basically the same thing.) We have a long proud history of being fundamentally decent human beings. There’s a whole Wikipedia entry on it.

*reaches the end of the chart*

*keeps clicking, convinced there’s more, somewhere*

*reaches end of page*




I feel just like I did at the end of season one of Sherlock!

You can’t end the story there! Guys! That’s narrative malpractice! There are so many unresolved plot points! Nothing more about why you refuse to submit to an independent financial analysis? Nothing explaining why the Strib was wrong for recommending you do so? Nothing about how your Industry News section only has sad articles about orchestras and never happy ones? Nothing about being sorry for treating the musicians like cogs in a machine? Nothing about how Henson is still earning roughly $1100 every single day the lockout churns on? (He’s earned over $36,000 since it began, by the way…) Nothing about the dozens upon dozens of questions I’ve raised on this blog? Nothing about why you won’t talk to Matt Peiken? Nothing about the intelligent questions Mary Schaefle asked? Nothing about the mysterious vanishing Michael Henson article of 2010 that everyone’s talking about? (Even frigging Alex Ross at The New Yorker knows about it at this point!) Guys, this was such a huge opportunity for you, and you just…you kind of blew it, to be honest.

I could tear this chart apart even further. Maybe I will, too, eventually, if I’m ever in the mood to shoot muskies in barrels. But doing so would just consist of me further blabbing about things I’ve already blabbed many thousands of words about, and that would be boring and a complete waste of space. (Just like this chart!) The only interesting thing about this crap is the fact that management found it necessary to post it. Is this a sign that they’re having difficulty winning over their public? Or that they’re gearing up to pull an SPCO and cancel concerts through December 31st within the next few days, and they want to be prepared for the surge of confused PO’d patrons who will be coming to their website looking for an explanation? Who the crap knows. But if prior efforts haven’t done anything to move the needle of public opinion, I can’t imagine this will.

Hey, Minnesota management! The day you start getting real, then I promise you, that’s the day I’ll drop the sarcasm and start taking you seriously. Until then, I can’t view management’s position as anything except a terrible joke. And I’m going to treat it with what an inappropriate joke deserves: with massive amounts of scorn and derision.


Filed under My Writing